Meaghan Duffy
12/10/14
Final paper
Professor Adam Johns
The Threat of Individuality
Individuality
distinguishes one existence from another.
The phenomena of individuality allows for a desire within each person to
create and persevere due to unique passion and intelligence. Distinctiveness and a loud identity, much
different from the social norm, is more prone to a few disapproving stares, but
it will be the reason for change and advancement. As Steve Jobs so famously said, “The people who
are crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones who do.”
A dramatic transition in values
can be linked back to the early 20th century, to the era famously
known as The Roaring Twenties. During
this time, trends became a prevalent part of society; people who strived to
prevent exclusion reached out to conformity in attempt to stay relevant. “Before
World War I, the country remained culturally and psychologically rooted in the
nineteenth century, but in the 1920s America seemed to break its wistful
attachments to the recent past and usher in a more modern era” (Zeitz). After a wartime recession caused by severe
hyperinflation around the world, the economy boomed in the decade following
WWI. A Progressive Era accompanied by
advances in technology, growth in big business and a thriving banking system,
created an economic boom, leaving Americans with much disposable income to
spend on luxuries. During this time, the
credit card was invented, which provoked spoiled Americans to participate in
unnecessary extravagant spending in order impress their neighbors. The 1920’s will forever be defined as,
“…flappers and dance halls, movie palaces and radio empires, and Prohibition
and speakeasies” (Zeitz). During this
time, dresses became shorter, brighter and lighter. New fabrics were
experimented with and designer brands
became a desire and indicator of worth and wealth. In this decade, the risk takers of society
were born. “Flappers prized style over substance,
novelty over tradition, and pleasure over virtue’ (Ferentinos). They cut their hair and shortened their
dresses above the knee. They
flirtatiously danced with men and participated in illegal drug use. These women were rebels against the
expectations to settle down and to stay obedient housewives, and they used
fashion and popular trends to get this message across. Since this time, how a woman or man presents
him or herself externally, sends a strong message about wealth, worth, values
and morals. Each individual is immediately
tagged and labeled as being a certain kind of person solely based on what he or
she has draped over his or her body. If
a man is not participating in the latest blazer trend or sporting his Oakley
sunglasses, he is considered irrelevant, and he is disregarded.
What is the point of rebellion if conforming is easier? In the 1950s, following America’s victory in
World War II, a wave of comfort swept across our country. The returning veterans presumed their home
jobs, which allowed their wives to escape the factories and return to their
household duties. Following the
conclusion of the war, there was a major shift in production from war materials
to consumer goods. Due to this victory,
the United States was considered a super power, promoting a time of peace and
prosperity. The values of capitalism
were rekindled, and this was made possible by the revolutionary invention of
the television. Serving as the perfect
median, television commercials provided the people with an insight into the
idea life. This ideal life, promoted by advertisements, included a cute house in
the suburbs, a white picket fence and a carload of children. In hopes of being socially accepted, many
people gave into this advertised conformity.
Along with the promoted idea of conformity, there existed a group of
rebels who initiated The Beat Generation.
This movement was lead by a group of disgruntled poets and writers whom were
disgusted with the newfound modern social structure and widespread consumer
attitude. “The Beat Generation was
never a large movement in terms of sheer numbers, but in influence and cultural
status they were more visible than any other competing aesthetic” (Rahn). Allen Ginsberg, a prominent author of The Beat
Generation, published his work Howl in
1956. Howl targeted the average Americans who were unaware of the
constant corruption and hardships surrounding them. This poem shown light on the parts of the
country that weren’t all safe smiles and sheltered bliss but instead the parts that
were struggling to stay alive. Ginsberg
explicitly gets his point across, stating, “I saw the best minds of my
generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked, dragging themselves
through the negro streets at dawn looking for an angry fix” (Ginsberg). This poem by Ginsberg strives to draw
attention to the social issues of drug use, starvation, pornography, poverty
and racism. It emphasizes that ignorance and escaping to the suburbs are not
acceptable remedies for these debilitating problems. Although The Beat Generation was scolded and
continuously insulted for being non-intellectual, “time has proven that the
cultural impact of the Beat writers was far from short-lived, as the influence
of their work continues to be widespread” (Rahn). The Beat Generation was responsible for
decreasing censorship in literature and highly increasing attention on
environmentalism.
In Octavia Butler’s Lilith’s Brood,
a foreign society is clashed with a group of earthlings. When Lilith, an American human, first comes
into contact with Jdahya, disgust, nerves and fright automatically overcome
her. “The unknown frightened her… She
did not want to be any closer to him.
She had not known what held her back before. Now she was certain it was his alienness, his
difference, his literal unearthliness” (Butler, 13). The American way has taught people to become
nervous and entirely closed off when it comes to the presence of the
unknown. Americans have been brought up
egotistically and arrogantly in a way that discourages the acceptance and study
of new culture. When Jdahya introduces
his people’s motives to Lilith he states, “We’re bot hierarchical, you
see. We never were. But we are powerfully acquisitive. We acquire new life- seek it, investigate it,
manipulate it, sort it, use it” (Butler, 41).
The Oanklali people have a deep desire to constantly and consistently
renew themselves, enabling them to evolve and survive as a species. They choose to change rather than to
fall into, “extinction or stagnation” (Butler, 40). Jdahya strives to explain to Lilith the
obvious flaws of mankind explaining that, “If they had been able to perceive
and solve their problems, they might have been able to avoid destruction”
(Butler, 38). The mere existence of war
as a concept, where humans kill and destroy life to somehow enhance other life,
is an absurd assumption that only a highly flawed species could ever believe is
sufficient. The Oankali species blame
humankind’s downfall on, “two incompatible characteristics.” Jdahya says, “You are intelligent… You are
hierarchical. When human intelligence
served [hierarchy] instead of guiding it, when human intelligence did not even
acknowledge it as a problem, but took pride in it or did not notice it at
all…”(Butler, 39), that’s when it became obvious that the two were in conflict
with each other.
In Yellow Woman and a Beauty of the Spirit, Leslie Marmon Silko
describes the lifestyle of the Laguna Pueblo in New Mexico. The Pueblo people
value the individual, focusing their judgments on behavior rather than physical
beauty. Silko says, “Younger people, people my
parents’ age, seemed to look at the world in a more modern way. The modern way includes racism (Silko,
10).” The Pueblo people, “looked at the world very differently; a person’s
appearance and possessions did not matter nearly as much as a person’s
behavior. For them, a person’s value
lies in how the person interacts with other people, how that person behaves
toward the animals and the earth (Silko, 10).”
According to them, a common maker relates all things, all people and all
animals upon creation. There is no
proper and improper, favored or disfavored, because everything in this universe
is created for an intended balance that is necessary to create harmony and
peaceful flow. Silko, as a young child,
was taught by her grandmother to be proud of her confidence and strength
because such qualities made her beautiful and valuable. “To the Pueblo way of thinking, the act of
comparing one living being with another was silly, because each being or thing
is unique and therefore incomparability valuable because it is the only one of
its kind (Silko, 11).” Among their
culture, there was no social ladder that could be influenced by choice of
clothing. The Pueblo people value physical
differences that would be pitied in our culture. What we ostracize, they celebrate. “Persons born with exceptional physical or
sexual differences were highly respected and honored because their physical
differences gave them special positions as mediators between this world and the
spirit world (Silko, 12).” Silko tells a
story about the hunchbacked medicine man who was seen as a universal healer and
of much importance in their culture; he was not labeled as disabled and less
capable as he would have been in modern American culture. One should not feel worthy of formulating
another’s full life story based on his or her physical attributes. Accepting individuality, as seen within the
Pueblo culture, allows for confidence, which stimulates action.
Some critics may argue that individuality allows for chaos and too much
room for feuding interpretations and strong disapproval. The coddlers of this world will say that
paying attention to the differences among a group creates an environment of
unfairness and discourages the shy minded of the world. These are the same people that support the
mandate of uniforms so their school is recognized as a conformed group rather
than a dense area of uniquely specialized individuals. A sea of gray pants and sweaters roaming a
hallway in unison makes it almost impossible for the brilliant stylist and the
obscure minds to express their passions and desires on the blank canvas of
their bodies. When humans are unable to
express their essence externally, they are less likely to express themselves verbally. Further, the figureheads of a capitalistic
society such as our own are easily spooked by the idea that an uncontrolled,
non-manipulated mind can change the world in a favorable way. People are scared of individuality because
there is a possibility of unexpected brilliance in a non-typical member of
society.
When the topic of celebrating the individual is brought up in a friendly
environment, many people will claim to agree with this. These are the same people who will shoot dirty
looks at the female with a buzz cut, or will be reluctant to join in on a fight
for a cause that they believe in. These
people hold back in fear of rocking the
boat. Such people are entirely
hypocritical and completely unaware of the meaning. When individuals religiously practice conformity
and uniformity out of worry that they will stand out in a negative light, yet
still preach individuality, they are once again falling into a trend. Conformists are scared to feel
discomfort. They practice uniformity so
that no child is left behind. While this
keeps every child up to date, it also works to prevent the star pupils from
shining. The exact reason for a bell
curve in an academic system is to condense the test takers into an
average. For decades, this nation has
catered toward the average Joe. We condemn the overachievers and pity the underachievers,
celebrating the masses that don’t draw too much attention their way. We do this because we’re petrified of being
left behind.
Work Cited:
Ferentinos, Susan. "Flapper." The
Ultimate History Project. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 Dec. 2014.
Zeitz,
Joshua. "The Roaring Twenties." The Gilder Lehrman Institute of
American History. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 Dec. 2014.
Silko,
Leslie Marmon. "Yellow Woman and a Beauty of the Spirit: Essays on Native
American Life Today." The Antioch Review 54.3 (1996): 364. Web.
Butler,
Octavia E. Lilith's Brood. New York: Aspect/Warner, 2000. Print.
Rahn, Josh.
"The Beat Generation." - Literature Periods & Movements.
Jalic Inc., n.d. Web. 7 Dec. 2014.
Ginsberg,
Alen. "Howl." Poetry Foundation. Ed. Ruth Graham. Poetry Foundation,
n.d. Web. 10 Dec. 2014.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.