Samantha Call
Seminar in Composition
Dr. Adam Johns
October 14, 2014
Making the Most of
Potential
Laura Ingalls
Wilder uses her writing in By the Shores
of Silver Lake to comment on the meaning of nature and the place of humans
in nature. According to Wilder, nature
is an endless realm of possibilities.
There is potential in it to find nearly anything you could be searching
for, whether it be something tangible or intangible. Nature is potential. However, it is different in the eyes of
different people. We must use the
potential that is nature to further ourselves as individuals and achieve our own
personal goals.
Wilder expresses
the unlimited potential of nature by constantly mentioning the vastness that
Laura sees in it. She comments on her
family’s journey to the West that “On every side now the prairie stretched away
empty to far, clear skyline. The wind
never stopped blowing, waving the tall prairie grasses that had turned brown in
the sun” (Wilder, 62). Throughout the
story, Laura is looking to this expanse of nature which she believes has
endless potential that “would last forever” (Wilder, 65), to satisfy her desire
for adventure and freedom. Since Laura has
been committed by her family to be Mary’s caretaker and eventually a teacher,
she naturally strives to break away from those adult responsibilities and enjoy
being a child. Nature offers her the
largest amount of potential to achieve the level of adventure and joy she is
searching for. When she is exploring
Silver Lake, “She want[s] to go on and on, into the slough among the wild birds…”
(Wilder, 78). She wants to go on into
the eternity that nature provides because it can take her away from those responsibilities
that hinder her in society. In the
prairie, she can continue on to be who she wants to be and do what she wants to
do. Ultimately, Laura does not continue
into nature; she reminds herself that she must stay to take care of her
sisters. Because of this, she does not
take advantage of the potential nature provides, and she ends up descending
further into the realm of adulthood she wishes she didn’t have to enter.
The same idea of
potential is expressed in Edward Abbey’s Desert
Solitaire. Although, in Abbey’s
case, the potential is spiritual, nature holds the ability for Abbey to achieve
what he wants, which is a separation from human kind that will help him reflect
on his own relationship with the world.
In Desert Solitaire, Abbey
ventures into nature as a park ranger to distance himself from what he believes
is a corrupt and intolerable society.
The potential in nature for him is its ability to allow separation from
society and connect to something other than other humans. He states that “The ease and relative
freedom of this lovely job at Arches follow from the comparative absence of the
motorized tourists” (Abbey, 42). Abbey
goes on adventures throughout his time and because of his utilization of
nature’s potential, he is able to make that nonhuman connection he was
craving. Toward the end of his journey,
he has rid himself of at least one downfall of humans, saying “I have overcome
at last that gallant infirmity of the soul called romance” (Abbey, 243). This means that Abbey’s venture into nature
leads to him realizing his goal. The
large expanse of land offered by Arches shows the potential of nature to be
isolating which is exactly what Abbey needs.
By seizing the exclusionary potential of nature, he finds what he is
looking for.
Potential in
nature cannot only be used to further individuals internally, but can to
produce tangible external results. This
is shown in both By the Shores of Silver
Lake and Desert Solitaire through
the developers. In Wilder’s story, most,
if not all, of the pioneers are moving westward to exploit nature’s
potential. They are in search of land
and profit, which are both held in the potential of nature. The prairie contains land for the travelers
to settle on, which can yield crops and sustain livestock. The Wilders plan on using their own land to “have
a garden and a little field, but mostly raise hay and cattle” (Wilder,
285). By moving to the West and taking
advantage of the land nature offers, the family plans to earn economic
stability and provide for themselves, which is their ultimate goal.
The developers in
Abbey’s memoir also plan to use nature.
Nature is potential for them because it holds the ability to gain
profit. By building the dam mentioned in
“Down the River,” the developers hope for the “generation of cash through
electricity for the indirect subsidy of various real estate speculators,
cottongrowers and sugarbeet magnates” (Abbey, 151). While this process is questioned on ethical
grounds, it shows the same amount of ambition as those who use nature for
internal reasons. Those who are molding
nature to fit their needs are using its potential to bring in what they
need. In the case of the dam builders,
it is money.
Despite the
rewards that different individuals or groups get from nature, the thing they
all have in common is that they are converting potential into results. Abbey,
Wilder, the pioneers, and the developers all see how nature can be used to
yield positive outcomes. The key is
choosing to seize the opportunities that nature hands us. Those who aren’t afraid to seize nature’s
potential are able to achieve their goals and obtain what they feel they need.
Works Cited
Abbey, Edward. Desert Solitaire: The First Morning & A
Season in the Wilderness. New York:
Touchstone, 1990. Print.
Wilder, Laura Ingalls.
By the Shores of Silver Lake. New York: Harper & Bros., 1953. Print.
“Nature is potential. However, it is different in the eyes of different people. We must use the potential that is nature to further ourselves as individuals and achieve our own personal goals.” -- I like the ‘nature is potential’ - Lewontin, incidentally, might say something like that. However, the next two sentences seem to retreat into vagueness. Be wary of definitions that refuse to define!
ReplyDeleteI liked the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs - you develop the idea well. My cautionary note is that I wonder whether you see a conceptual unity in the two kinds of potential. I mean, you clearly do, but there’s an ambivalence here.
Toward the close of the essay, you explore different *kinds* of potential. This is all interesting and well-executed, but it’s also diffuse. Is spiritual potential (Abbey) and “inner” potential (Wilder) really the same as economic potential? I’m not saying that it isn’t, but I do think there are some large gaps here which could be addressed. Part of you wants to draw a distinction between the inner and the outer; part of you wants to erase that distinction. I’d be happier if the argument wrestled with that problem rather than evading it.