Jessi
Duffner
Dr. Adam
Johns
Seminar
in Composition
15
October 2014
Wilder’s Take on Nature
Throughout many of the books we have read
so far this semester, the topic of nature is intensively discussed. All the
authors seem to have a universally contradicting definition of nature. Much
like Edward Abbey, Wilder shows us that nature is a beautiful yet harmful
environment that greatly influences our view of the world. We must acknowledge
both extremes of nature so we may responsibly explore potentially unknown
territory. Also, we must analyze how both authors are impacted by nature.
Nature is an incredible environment to
explore. From plant life to wildlife, nature gives humans much to admire. Wilder
illustrates the beautiful and delicate side of nature when she describes one
evening at silver lake. She writes, “Beyond the lake’s eastern shore the pale
sky was bordered with bands of crimson and gold. Their brightness stretched
around the south shore and shone on the high bank that stood up from the water
in the east and the north” (71). We must appreciate all nature has to offer
because most individuals don’t often experience life outside of modern
civilization. Similarly to Wilder, Abbey displays the beauty of the desert
elegantly in the chapter “Solitaire.” He admires the sky and describes to the
reader:
“Dark clouds sailing overhead across the
fields of the stars. Stars which are usually bold and close, with an icy
glitter in their light – glints of blue, emerald, gold. Out there, spread
before me to the south, east, and north, the arches and cliffs and pinnacles
and balanced rocks of sandstone (now entrusted to my care) have lost the rosy
glow of sunset and become soft, intangible, in unnamed, unnamable shades of
violet, colors that seem to radiate – not overlay – their surfaces” (Abbey
13-14).
The
beauty of nature is highly important to Abbey, as it should be to everyone. A
world without nature would offer no escape and little inspiration.
While nature has many positive aspects,
it can be harmful as well. Humans tend to become caught up in the beauty of
nature, forgetting potential dangers nature has in store. The ugly side of
nature is portrayed in the chapter “Last Man Out.” Laura and Pa discover wolf
tracks and they discuss their findings, “Those wolves must be very big and
heavy. ‘Buffalo wolves are the largest wolves on the prairie and very fierce,’
Pa told her. ‘I’d hate to meet one without a gun’” (Wilder 153). Pa is teaching
Laura she must be careful or else she could become the prey. We cannot overlook
threats nature has in store. Edward Abbey also reveals the dark side of nature
when he describes the desert as “a-tonal, cruel, clear, inhuman, neither
romantic nor classical, motionless and emotionless, at one and the same time –
another paradox – both agonized and deeply still” (Abbey 319). Abbey uses much
of the book to describe the beautiful scenery, but the condition of the desert
must be taken into account. The desert is truly a cruel environment. Humans
have struggled to live in the desert and plants and animals need special
adaptations to survive.
Nature also has an immense impact on the
lives of humans. While not all individuals have the opportunity to live in the
wilderness many briefly explore it; This exploration tends to alter humans’
views on society. In Wilder’s case, she begins to appreciate industrialization.
In the chapter “End of the Rails” the family comes to the end of their train
ride, full of open fields and beautiful views. However, Laura quickly becomes enthralled
with the rail workers. Wilder writes, “There was nothing as wonderful as
railroads, and railroad men were great men, able to drive the big iron engines
and the fast, dangerous trains” (Wilder 30). She does not hate nature, but she
believes industrialization is an amazing concept. In a way, the emptiness of
the wide-open fields triggers Laura’s love for the excitement of industrialization.
In contrast, nature causes Edward Abbey to grow a sort of hatred for modern
civilization. He points out how
wonderful the feeling of temporary separation from society is when he remarks:
“My God! I am thinking, what incredible shit we put up with most of our lives
– the domestic routine (same
old wife every night), the stupid and useless degrading jobs, the insufferable
arrogance of elected officials, the crafty cheating and the slimy
advertising of the business men, the tedious wars in which we kill our buddies
instead of our real enemies
back in the capital, the foul diseased and hideous cities and towns we live in, the constant petty tyranny of automatic washers
and automobiles and TV machines and telephone!” (193).
Abbey
has come to believe that humans have become lost in modern technology, losing
sight of nature and all it has to offer.
I believe it is important we look at
nature from all of these standpoints. There is harm in seeing only good or only
bad in nature. Constantly viewing nature through one extreme is naïve.
Nonetheless, we shall grow to understand how nature affects our lives.
Regardless of how obvious it may be, we are all moved by nature in some way,
shape, or form.
Works
Cited:
Abbey,
Edward. Desert Solitaire: A Season in the
Wildrness. New York: Ballantine, 1968. Print.
Wilder,
Laura Ingalls. By the Shores of Silver Lake. New York:
Harper & Bros., 1953. Print.
I don’t see anything resembling a clear thesis at the start.
ReplyDelete“The beauty of nature is highly important to Abbey, as it should be to everyone. A world without nature would offer no escape and little inspiration.” -- is nature about escape for Wilder or Abbey? Maybe, and if so, that might be an argument worth exploring - but if that’s the case, you should make an *argument* about nature as escape, rather than beating around the bush.
“In a way, the emptiness of the wide-open fields triggers Laura’s love for the excitement of industrialization. In contrast, nature causes Edward Abbey to grow a sort of hatred for modern civilization.” -- the danger that you seem to be slipping into here is doing a kind of compare-and-contrast. It’s fine to compare and it’s fine to contrast - but you should be doing those things in service of an argument. I don’t see where you’re heading here.
Your conclusion doesn’t have an argument, let alone an actual thesis. You retreat away from saying anything at all, in fact, but say pretty obvious things.
Short version: this dodged around everything in the prompt that tried to make it challenging.
Hey Jessi--I'm sorry I didn't write a comment earlier. I think your point about the contradicting aspects of nature does become clearer later on, but it is difficult to figure out at first. Your various paragraphs feel disorganized and a little disconnected. I think if you had a stronger conclusion it would have held up your essay better.
ReplyDeleteI liked your quotes taken from Abbey, I think they were chosen especially well. Keeping a possible revision in mind, I think you would do best to build on your argument. For example, why is nature contradicting? Why can't it be as simple as one or the other? And what is your evidence to back this up?