Meaghan Duffy
11/19/14
Final project proposal
Professor Adam Johns
Proposed argument: Living in
a world such as ours, it is important to understand and be well aware of the
abundance of religions, languages, cultures and lifestyles practiced by the
pockets of people surrounding us.
Why does it matter? : Those
who are content with only knowing and exploring what is directly in front of
them run the huge risk of seeming increasingly ignorant and are less able to
adjust to change and are conduct logical decision making.
I chose to focus on this topic
because in order to write a successful extended paper, I believe it becomes
easier and flows better if the writer is super passionate about the topic, as I
am with this one. Growing up and taking an abundance
of history and world culture classes I have become accustomed to thinking in a
way that follows the logic that although it is important to have an opinion on a
topic it is also important to understand the opinions of others even if you doesn’t
necessarily agree.
Counterargument: One should thoroughly understand his/her direct
surroundings before he or she ventures out into the complete unknown searching
for different views.
Why is this counterargument wrong? :
1) Humans, and the society that
humans have created for centuries, are so ridiculously intricately dynamic and
complicated that it would be entirely foolish to believe that any single thing
could ever be completely understood.
2) Those who travel and search the
intricacies of different separated life forms and lifestyles are able to
collectively think about things from a variety of standpoints and produce the
most valid conclusion or solution from their acquired knowledge.
Rough outline:
Paragraph 1: Introduction to topic. Discuss the importance of well informed opinions and the difference
between understanding a clause and supporting that clause. End paragraph with a clear thesis
statement.
Paragraph 2: Briefly discuss the culture, economics and
politics of very different cultures and the reasoning and logic behind each to
allow the reader to understand that not everyone follows the same ideals as
his/her country or other associated area.
Paragraph 3: Discuss specific quotes and examples from, Desert
Solitaire, where Abbey writes about how disappointed he is in humans
because of their inability to step out of society and enjoy the small
intricacies of nature and other forms of life away from big business and
hierarchy. Use example where he scolds
people for driving through the national park staying in the safety of their
cars not even hopping out to take a deep breath of fresh air or look up close
to the life occurring all around them.
Possibly discuss more of Abbey’s work and papers written about him.
Paragraph 4: Maybe I will bring in Butler’s work, writing
about how a severe lack of understanding of culture between the Oankali people
and humans created a noticeable level of distrust and tension throughout.
Paragraph 5 and on: In the next few
paragraphs I plan on discussing specific examples in history where ignorant
political decisions led to failures for different countries. Have an idea of using the U.S. entrance into
and fight in the Vietnam war and the unsuccessful Bay of Pigs invasion into
Cuba. A new paragraph will logically
plan out how, if the people in power were more knowledgeable about the standings
and plans of their so-called “enemies,” they would have been able to be more
successful in their conquest.
Finishing paragraph/s: Plan to finish my paper by further stressing
my original argument and discussing how studying and understanding the ideals
of others can create a more open mind and a more peacefully coexisting
world.
Bibliography:
Abbey, Edward. Desert Solitaire; a Season in the Wilderness.
New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968. Print.
Butler,
Octavia E. Lilith's Brood. New York: Aspect/Warner, 2000. Print.
An article
or possible psychological study correlating intelligence and diversity, or an
article simply discussing the importance of knowledge of diversity.
A
literary work written on political downfalls based on ignorant decisions.
You and I already discussed this in some detail, and nothing much has changed. I do have one comment re: a part of the proposal that I'd missed before - one possibility here, if you really want to work with both Abbey and the Vietnam war, is to argue that even though Desert Solitaire is about the desert, it's also about Vietnam, and specifically about sympathy for our "enemies" in Vietnam. That topic might not be close enough to your passion, but it might also be a focused way into it - I just thought I'd toss that idea out.
ReplyDelete