Emma Sullivan
Project Proposal
Potential argument(s): In my paper, I want to explore just why our
society has become such a carnivorous, toxic environment when it comes to
eating and perhaps shed a light on why we are so resistant to change. To do so,
I plan to highlight two documentaries that have been made which paradigm
lifestyle changes people have made, and talk about why they are effective in
both their information, and persuasiveness. I am also exploring the possibility
of having 2 “subjects” watch these documentaries and answer a series of
questions in order to examine whether these films invoke change on either
individual. This experiment is tentative, but definitely something I may
include in my paper. The purpose of this paper is both to inform and enlighten,
and will explore the idea we discussed many times in class of how things are,
and how things ought to be.
Significance: In this paper, I plan to compile various statistics
pertaining to health and food in America today in order to emphasize the need
for change. In this way, I hope to get the reader thinking about the need for
change as well as the factors holding change back, which we need to overcome on
an individual and societal level.
Possible Counterarguments: As of where my argument stands right
now, some possible counterarguments that could arise include the idea that we
have the freedom to choose what we eat individually, and that right should not
be controlled or mandated in any way. When, in fact it is mandated currently by
our government, which allows for the level and poor quality of agriculture that
goes on in America today. I also plan to absolve the idea that it would be
impossible to shut down these big-business corporations with proposals on how
to make our food industry more small-scale and local. Essentially, I plan on
not just saying how things ought to be—but also giving examples of how to make
the “ought to be” happen.
Bibliography:
"Being a Vegetarian." Brown University.
Brown University, n.d. Web. 18 Nov. 2014. This source provides some simple
definitions/facts that I may include in the introductory paragraphs of my
paper.
"Compassion for the Animals." Animal Rights
and Vegetarianism- Why Be a Vegetarian? N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Nov. 2014. This
source is one that provides several general arguments for becoming a
vegetarian, which I will be highlighting and referencing throughout my paper. I
will most likely be conduction further research on several of them.
Fat, Sick, & Nearly Dead.
Cross, Joe., et al. Brooklyn, NY: Reboot Media, 2011. This is one of the
2 documentaries I plan on utilizing in my paper. It illustrates tangible and
drastic change made by one person, which affected many.
Graham Hill: Why I'm a Weekday Vegetarian. Perf. Graham Hill. TED
Talks, 2010.
This source brings to light some of the environmental
benefits of becoming a vegetarian, and adds another component to my argument
that is aside from the issue of health alone.
Vegucated. Dir. Marisa Miller Wolfson. Perf. Marisa Miller Wolfson.
Kind Green Planet/Get Vegucated,
2011.
This is the other documentary which I plan on utilizing
and potentially showing to experimenters.
I also plan to do more in depth research on several
statistics, companies, etc. I will discern what areas need further research as
I begin drafting my paper.
Rough Outline:
Paragraph one: an introduction, including some shocking
and worrisome facts about the state of our health and food system as a whole
today. I also plan to clearly define my argument.
Paragraph two: I hope to include research on vegetarianism/veganism,
as well as a further investigation of what we are doing wrong as a country by
eating meat
Paragraph three: I will introduce the question of why
people have such a hard time changing, and introduce Fat, Sick, and Nearly Dead and begin discussing this movie (this
may be split into multiple paragraphs)
Paragraph 4: I will also introduce Vegucated and discuss its cause/what we should take from it, and
also look at some ways its effective.
Paragraph 5: I will introduce the possible survey I hope to
conduct, and give a brief over view on the subjects.
Paragraphs 6-9: In approximately 3 paragraphs I plan to
examine the findings and make something of them in relation to the need to
change—this will all be depending on what I find.
Paragraph 10: Potential counterarguments may come into
play for a paragraph, which will introduce some proposals from both others and
myself on how we can change
Paragraphs ?: Potential solutions and conclusion of what
to take from this
*Note that many of these “paragraphs” will most likely
split into several paragraphs, and will of course be returning and emphasizing
the idea of how things are and things ought to be throughout the paper.
This is fine, but quite broad. As you go, you'll need to find ways of focusing it. While there are disadvantages in just basing your essay on what two people think of a couple documentaries, there are advantages, too. The big problems are well documented (what can you hope to add to what's already there, re: just explaining how our agricultural system makes us sick), but our failure to change is disturbing and interesting - so focusing upon the changes that particular individuals make or fail to make does really have promise.
ReplyDeleteThe narrower the better, as far as I'm concerned. Strictly as an example, there wouldn't be anything wrong with an essay exploring why it's so hard to get a tax imposed on sweetened beverages even in places like Berkeley: this essay might be more focused on policy (here's how we can convince people to accept the tax) or more focused on the philosophical side of the situation (here's what our "principled" insistence on overconsumption *means*).
It would be kind of funny to start out with Thanksgiving - maybe with the role of mechanized agriculture & processed food in what was once the harvest festival of people who farmed the land themselves. Regardless of whether you start watching a person watch a documentary, or analyze how Thanksgiving dinner is made (farm, factory and table), you want to find a focused way into your larger argument. I know it's the big picture that really inspires you, but the way we make people see big problems from fresh angles is by starting small.