Jonathan Hranek
Dr. Adam Johns
English Composition 0200
14 November 2014
The Unobserved Hierarchical Structure
Hierarchies
are visible constantly in daily life, whether within jobs, classes, or society.
There are always factors that lead to competition, and it is this competitive
edge that drives human capacities for learning and understanding evermore into
the depths of the unknown and unexplored. However, the Oankali within Octavia
Butler’s “Lilith’s Brood” disagree wholeheartedly with this rationale. Although
incorrect and hypocritical, they argue that the very hierarchical structure
that defines everything that humans know is actually the greatest reason for
the downfall of their society.
According
to the Oankali, the two fatal flaws of humans are intelligence and the
hierarchies that are so natural and present in the environment. One alone, they
say, could be useful and possibly even successful, but the two genetic
characteristics combined are a terrible mixture. This all comes down to the
fact that both lead to further competition between peoples. Intelligence allows
a person to perceive when he or she is being cheated by belonging to a lesser
hierarchy, and therefore stimulates that person and gives he or she the desire
to climb the ladder of society and go as high as possible. Through
intelligence, people are given the ability to ignore the flaws in the
structural hierarchy. This could possibly be the most dangerous aspect of the
structure because it prevents individuals from seeing the seemingly equal inequalities
that are the results of a hierarchy, as will be seen in the Oankali society. On
the surface level, everything seems to be the same, but through a deeper search
it is found to be that differences lead to categorization and eventually causes
a hierarchy. Furthermore, by always providing people with a dream of being more
successful, those very same people will then compete for better jobs, therefore
impacting their friendships and relationships with other people. These two
characteristics only lead to more strife between people and factions. In this
way, it is almost like the Oankali view humans to be the perfect species to
kill themselves because the society is always trying to one-up its competitors.
By constantly attempting to out-do one another, tensions can rise and lead to conflict
due to the downtrodden being kept stationary for too long.
The
views of the Oankali are presented through a message of warning conveyed in the
shape of simple observations. This cautioning information advises to tread
carefully where intelligence and hierarchies are mixed, as it can lead to the
destruction of human society and humanity as a whole. However, this is simply not true. The Oankali
are extremely biased due to their inability to relate to humans. They believe
it to be a downfall to humanity if intelligence and hierarchies are
intertwined. Contrary to what they think, intelligence and hierarchies are the
foundation to every major change in human history. There are certainly
downsides to both aspects of the characteristics, but without them, people
would neither have the desire to progress, nor the ability to do so.
Intelligence gives people the chance to climb the social ladder while the
hierarchical structure makes them realize where they are and gives them the
drive to get to where they need to be. In its essence, this is what the Oankali
are opposed to, simply because they do not fully understand the concept of a
combination of intelligence and hierarchy since they cannot recognize it within
their own society.
The
Oankali are hypocritical because they themselves intertwine intelligence and
hierarchy. This is due to their inability to prevent the transfer of specie’s
downfalls when they genetically engineer themselves by mixing their genes with
those of a new race. They are analytical enough to recognize what they believe
to be the “Achilles Heel” of the human race, but what they fail to comprehend
is that by identifying the problems with humanity, they are actually pointing
out their own defects. These defects are within their own society, and by distinguishing
these flaws, they pinpoint their inability to identify the problems within
their unique culture, but are quick to place the blame on humanity. This is
seen through the Ooloi who seem to lead the society, and because of this, their
ability to determine the species with which to trade genetic information begins
a hierarchical dilemma that the Oankali are so unobservantly deft about. The
hierarchy starts with the Ooloi at the top, followed together by the male and
female Oankali. This is because both genders of the Oankali refuse to give
certain information to the humans until such a time that they deem necessary.
This ascertaining and division of power by the Oankali over the humans, as well
as the fact that the Oankali listen to and follow the directions of the Ooloi,
sets up the perfect structure for a hierarchical society.
The Oankali are undoubtedly intelligent, but
this intelligence causes them to overlook the fact that there is a hierarchy
within their society, which gives them a mentality that is seemingly jaded. Therefore,
the Oankali race unknowingly incorporates hierarchical structures into their
culture when they trade with humans. They think that they have escaped
humanity’s downfall because they do not live in a hierarchical society, but
this is simply not true. As they say, intelligence and hierarchy separately
could be advantageous, but they create a destructive force when combined
together. This is seen when Jdahya says, “The Ooloi are intensely interested in
[cancer]. It suggests abilities we have never been able to trade for
successfully before … the Ooloi see great potential in it” (Butler 40). Part of
the Oankali’s problem about the unnoticed hierarchy is that although they perceive
themselves to be the same and equal, there are defining the key differences between
the Oankali and the Ooloi. For example, the Ooloi have an organelle that allows
them to “perceive DNA and manipulate it precisely”, which sets them apart from
the Oankali. Differences such as these only highlight the already ingratiated hierarchy
within their culture. The Oankali race believes that each section of its current
society (including humans) has a specific job, but it is this specificity that sheds
light on their harsh judgments about humanity, and ultimately, their ignored hypocrisy.
“The Oankali fall rigidly into these roles” (Johns 383), and it is this
separation that divides the race into a hierarchy. Although they may purposefully
“not seek or acquire status”, the Oankali cannot help but to be “hierarchical
in their structure” (Johns 382). This is due to their ingrained drive to further
promote the advancement of their race, which forces them to be inadvertently
biased in their judgments, as well as rash in their analysis about the humans
with which they are trading genetic information.
Although
the Oankali believe that the two genetic characteristics of hierarchy and
intelligence are fatal when put together, they are simply incorrect. Without
these two features of humanity driving each other, progress could never have
been made. Conflict may arise, but the overall benefits of a competitive
environment are necessary to further that growth and development, and therefore
outweigh the potential dangers. This is something the Oankali do not
understand. Since they are incapable of recognizing it within their own
society, let alone the society and culture of another race. Through their
internal drive to genetically trade their DNA, to the definitive lines in the
hierarchical structure that is clearly present in their society, the Oankali inadvertently
allow their intelligence to avert their eyes from seeing the real situation. By
mixing genes with other races, there is no foolproof way to avoid the flaws of
that species. Simply put, more than the just the beneficial aspects of that race
will be inherited as well, including some flaws that might not be positive. In
this way, the limitations of a hierarchy and intelligence are not accepted, but
ignored.
Works Cited
Butler, Octavia E. Lilith's Brood. New York:
Aspect/Warner, 2000. Print.
Johns, J. Adam. "Becoming Medusa: Octavia Butler's "Lilith's
Brood" and Sociobiology." Science Fiction Studies 37.3 (2010):
382-400. JSTOR. Web. 13 Nov. 2014.
<http://www.jstor.org/stable/25746440>.
Your wording makes this a little tricky: “Although incorrect and hypocritical, they argue that the very hierarchical structure that defines everything that humans know is actually the greatest reason for the downfall of their society.” If you’re arguing that they are incorrect and hypocritical, you could have just worded it more clearly & directly.
ReplyDeleteI think an issue here is parsing out what the Oankali would agree and disagree with: “Contrary to what they think, intelligence and hierarchies are the foundation to every major change in human history. There are certainly downsides to both aspects of the characteristics, but without them, people would neither have the desire to progress, nor the ability to do so.” The Oankali *agree* that hierarchy + intelligence has fueled human progress. But they *also* argue that it dooms us. You’re oversimplifying their argument, in other words.
“The Oankali are hypocritical because they themselves intertwine intelligence and hierarchy.” -- This is a fine argument. It probably should have been more clearly within the thesis, although I’m not sure that it’s the whole thesis. The problem with this argument, though, is that you are *assuming* that the Ooloi are in charge. This is an argument that needs to be made through a careful reading of the text - and you also need to think about what the term hierarchy means. Even if the ooloi run things (which isn’t obvious, although you might be able to make the argument) that’s not quite the same as saying that the Oankali have a hierarchy in the human sense (which would imply having a dominance structure among the ooloi as well).
Obviously I don’t disagree with the premise that the Oankali have a kind of hierarchy, but the devil is in the details. Is the hierarchy within their own bodies, through the dominance of the organelle? Is it in their relationship with other species? Is it in their politics or economy? Your approach here is fine, even clever, and I’m pretty confident that it’s your best work so far, but you don’t actually do much to make your core argument - the claim that the Ooloi are dominant is an assumption, when you should be arguing it in detail.